Some social workers in Newham Council are currently acting against their duties and code of conduct by conspiring against vulnerable families and especially minor children whose rights have been abused.
Those individuals work within public bodies. Despite complaints to Health Care professionals Council (HCPC), this body fails to assist and therefore cause substantial damages to those children. HCPC allows perjury, false representations, and child abuse. this happens to vulnerable people such as Asylum Seekers, migrants and other British vulnerable people.
Please see below:
On 13 May 2014, Children Services sent me an email confirming that I will be contacted within 7 days with regards to a Child In Need Assessment.
- On 23 May 2014, I emailed to Mr xxxx as I was not contacted by Children Services.
- On the same day at 11am, Mr James advised that he has emailed to Social Services to find out what was happening. At 12.14pm, Mr Marc Davis called me on my mobile number and the conversation lasted for 7 minutes. He tried to convince me that they do not have a duty to support and he knew the law. In that instance, he advised that he will attend our premises on 27 May 2014 at 5.30pm with another female social worker to discuss about the law. He confirmed the social worker’s availability at the same time.
- On 27 May 2014 at about 5.45pm, Mr Davis phoned me to tell that he will not be able to attend the appointment as he was busy. He advised that he can attend at 6.30pm. I disagreed because of my children’s day to day activities. The call duration was 2 minutes. We then agreed for a visit on 28 May 2014 at 5.30pm assisted by the same female social worker.
- On 28 May 2014, Mr Davis did not appear until 6pm when we were in the bath. However, I went down with my bath robe on while he was calling my phone. He verbally said his name but failed to show me his ID card. I enquired about the other female social worker who did not accompany him. We had a long discussion about various issues from Section 17 Children Act 1989 support to my forthcoming plans. He was very inquisitive about my future steps and my asylum support appeal and immigration status.
Marc Davis and Home Office
- On 28 May 2014, the Home Office sent us some documents with regards to the asylum support appeal hearing dated 4th June 2014. Those documents contained over 140 pages and at page 136, Mr Marc Davis’s name appears at several places. It indicated in the minutes written by Mr Clifford Kirsch:
“Marc Davis at Newham Social Services is like minded on the case and content to inform Ismail that they are putting the children at risk themselves due to support and accommodation being available in Birmingham and that the court has stated there is no reason for them not to be dispersed there…”
The minutes continued: “The possibility of removal of the children into care is being raised by Mark with the family and details of this will follow in due course 11:00hrs…”
- On 14 May 2014, Newham Social Services Marc Davis informed fully of the situation with the children. xxxx – Cliff Kirsch.
It is confirmed that you had prior communication with the Home Office (some we may not be aware of) and you did not inform me about this at all. Nevertheless after discussing this with my community/friends and family and my children’s legal guardians (as my life is under threats) after my Friday Prayers, they were concerned and shaken up with the document/evidence. They said that this is not a correct procedure. They were concerned about the fact that you spoke about ‘custody’ and ‘care’. This is very disappointing to note that you have attended the home without telling me that you previously communicated with Mr Kirsch and you acted as if you did not know anything and you were independent.
You did not say to me that the Home Office spoke to you regarding children safety and claimed that we are putting the children at risks. You merely kept quiet and collected all my information. Now I am concerned that you will disclose my future steps and my confidential information including the safety measures to the Home Office or to other agents.
You have acted dishonestly, unless you clarify your position. If you have communicated and those comments above are true, a complaint will follow accordingly. But if you have not commented as above, it is in your best interests to clarify your position in writing and give us a letter (addressing to the Asylum Support Tribunal) indicating that these above paragraphs / comments are untrue or inaccurate.
My evidence shows that this is a serious conspiracy against the children and it can amount to child abuse. You are well aware as a social worker that abusing children’s interests and conspiring against them and their families are against the law. My community will be ready to assist me in this instance.
Please note that my premises is under surveillance monitoring equipment as you correctly identify that there is a threat to me and my family from certain individuals of the State.
I am very saddened and shocked when I saw the document received from the Home Office when you left the home on 28th May. I trusted you so much that I spoke to you openly and told you everything about myself and my family in confidence. Now, I am in limbo thinking that you may have been untruthful and may have conspired with the Home Office prior to your visit to my family home on 28 May 2014. I understand that as you are familiar with the law, you may be aware that acting in this way is illegal and is not expected from a social worker from Children Services registered with HPC.
Please note that there is no room to even mention about child safety or custody or care as we are ourselves professional teachers and child safety officers. We indeed have threats from individuals from the State, but that does not give rise to mention about custody. You should have taken legal steps to protect us and the children and allow us to perform our parental duties. We recalled the occasion when Newham children services made a false witness statement under oath in 2012 which amounted to criminal conspiracy against the children. The letters from the schools were shown to Mr Davis.
I rely upon your cooperation. We await your response before 5 pm on Monday 2nd June 2014. I am henceforth attaching Pages 136 and 137 for your consideration and it will be appreciated if you could clarify your position and address the letter to First-Tier Tribunal Asylum Support.
I request you refrain from communicating with any organisation without our consent or consent from the children’s legal guardian (in our absence). If further communications occur, it may be against Data Protection Act 1998 and other statutes.
Complaints were made to HCPC about Mr mark Davis:
Health and Care Professions Council and Mr Mark Davis
Thank you for your email whereby you helpfully clarified your concerns to me and provided me the minutes of the meeting held by the Home Office.
I note that you have requested for copies of correspondence between Mr Davis and the Home Office if this is provided to the HCPC.
If you require any documents, then you must make a request under the freedom of information act by putting your request in writing and another team will deal with this request separately.
I shall now make further enquiries with Newham Council as to why they have not responded to your complaint and shall keep you updated on our investigation in due course. Can you confirm who specifically you addressed your complaint to in particular in order for me to make enquiries with them?
_______________________________________________________________________________________
ftp@hcpc-uk.org (ftp@hcpc-uk.org)
This is to inform you that Mr mark Davis is still engaging in conspiracy as we received an email from him today. He is apparently advising his colleagues by plotting against us. He is also apparently engaged in conspiracy. Mr Davis is trying to cover up his negligence of duty of care. He is misusing his position to abuse children’s rights. He is also obstructing other social workers to carry on their duties appropriately in our children’s case.
Mr Mowli Ali and Ms Ellen Mundoma were assigned to our children’s case for reassessments. The matter was under process when suddenly today Mr Mark Davis appeared and apparently interfered / obstructed their duties. He has advised them to contact UKBA (his colleagues) without our consent and failing to consider children’s best interests knowingly and recklessly to cause substantial harm.
If you require any evidence, please do inform us. We expect your urgent actions in this regard to stop Mr Davis from further illegal and continuous schemes which are putting our children’s lives at risks.
We believe that Mr Davis is aware about a complaint to HCPC and he is obviously obstructing this to harm us and the children.
Yours faithfully,
_______________________________________
Dear Madam,
Please see below an email sent on 8th September 14 regarding our child who was sustained injuries due to the interference of Mr Mark Davis as he has misused his position as a social worker. He has prevented the support which we are entitled to. Your failure of restraining him to cause further harm to vulnerable children is unjustified and amounts to inhuman and degrading treatment. It also amounts to discrimination based on our ethnicity, religion and particular group. You have unreasonably allowed Mr. Davis to misuse his position and to consistently engage in conspiracies.
Indeed as a practice manager, Mr. Davis has good relationships and communications with other organisations. There is a particular in our case by senior members of children services and the Newham Council as we have raised important part of the law. We have also sustained several evidences against them.
- The children case was allocated to Mr. Mowli Ali whose manager is Ellen. Ms Lesley Gordon form Adult social care confirmed in an email that reassessment will be done and alternative accommodation can be discussed with Mr. Mowli Ali.
- After two days, Mr Mark Davis appeared in an email and we were shocked. We find that he is a hypocrite and a dishonest. On our point of view, he has committed an offence towards our family.
There is reasonable doubt to believe that you have communicated with Mr Davis and requested him to intervene in our matters to destroy us and to prevent us to focus on his own complaint. We are having this doubt. Otherwise, there was no reason for Mr Davis for appearing on the case all of a sudden since may 2014 and obstruct Mr Ali’s duties.
He has also held our supports and assessment and all other entitlements to cause a substantial prejudice to us. He is simply awaiting the court’s hearing scheduled on Thursday 11/./9/2014. He has used his position to liaise with other agencies to cause us harm as he has clearly done as explained in our initial complaint.
Therefore, his credibility is severely damaged and he is to be restrained form intervening and looking into our case unless he is in a position to make a positive obligation without further delays.
I am still inquisitive about the reasons why he appeared suddenly to interfere in the work of Mr. Ali and Ms Ellen Mundowa and the Adult social care.
Mr Davis has also interfered with the course of justice and he uses his links whenever a hearing occurs. He campaigns against us internally.
You have informed him about his complaint to HCVPC and this is the reasons why the above took place. You told that you will take 12 weeks to make a decision, but we do not know what will happen in that period. I remind you of Ms Norma Irish’s complaint when Ms Siobhan took over a year to investigate thinking that we will be destroyed or harmed. She waited patiently but at the end, as this did not happen, she came up with another scheme.
If HCPC does not have power to make decision on the assessment of our children’s needs, then it is doubtful that Ms Siobhan did comment on those particular assessments. However, we haven’t asked you to interfere in any child in need assessments. We have proved to you that Ms Davis has harmed our family with evidences. We have complained about a social worker who has committed criminal offences and currently we are doubtful about your independency.
It is noted that after the hearing of This Thursday, Mr. Davis will come up with a new excuse or plan. He is simply running a scheme.
Please note that there is a lack of transparency as we are entitled to know what you have communicated with Newham council and what you have written to them.
We await your prompt reply. We believe that you will take a constructive view. we are in the intention to campaign against those injustices and failure of your organisation to prevent the child to be further abused and injured due to these types of social workers and schemes surrounding our family including other organisations.
Regards
Mr and Mrs. Ismail
INCIDENT UPDATE
I am writing to inform you that my youngest son Imran was badly hurt today in the accommodation provided by Newham council at approximately 9.30pm. At that moment, I was looking after my husband who had his regular seizures in one bedroom when the child ran to look for me. He then fell down the two steps which lead to the bedroom and injured his forehead with bleeding. I had to call my family friends who live nearby my home to help me and assist Mr Ismail. They (Mr Dawood’s family) can be contacted at any time. If they were not available, I do not know what would have to Mr Ismail due to his severe life-threatening epilepsy as indicated by his consultants.
As I indicated to you on several occasions, I am unable to look after my husband when he is having his seizures or any symptoms related to his epilepsy. I asked you to provide him with care needs to assist him. He is difficult to manage when he gets seizures. I therefore find it impossible to look after him hereafter. For me, my children are a priority.
I understand that you have not taken any steps to prevent Mr Ismail from harm. You have also disregarded the request for a carer’s assessment when I indicated to Mrs Lynn Tan that I refuse to look after Mr Ismail. The same request was made to Ms Gordon and Adult Social Care Team with no response. I have consistently informed you about the situation.
As indicated, the accommodation in which we are currently living does not meet Mr. Ismail’s requirements and neither the children’s. I have clearly outlined your duties in an email this morning. I rely upon your cooperation in this issue and to take urgent steps to prevent any future incidents. Please note that several incidents happened before , but I will regularly update you from now onwards as my child has got injured due to Mr Ismail’s lack of support from yourself. I will take the child to the GP tomorrow and update you as the emergency services (999) advised.
Yours Faithfully,
Mrs Ismail
Parents Against Injustice UK 