BOW COUNTY COURT’S ROLE IN EVICTIONS

A simple scenario about the involvement of Bow County Court

in the various evictions which take place in Newham

Our opinions are based on the various cases which we dealt personally.

Tenants are issued possession proceedings for either rent arrears, reduction of benefits, loss of jobs due to exceptional circumstances or disabilities.  Possession proceedings start at Bow County court but most of the time, the tenants are not even served with the papers and a possession order is made in their absence without giving them the opportunity to file a defence. District judges make orders as follows based on what Newham council says in their claim:

“Upon Hearing representative for The mayor & Burgesses of the London Borough of Newham, the court gives the claimant possession of the property …..”

Hence, the council gets the possession order and then serve on the tenant who will obviously be in a state of distress and shock. The tenant will then be intimidated by the council’s officers to accept any offer of accommodation outside London or in the outskirts of the city. I know a lady who has been evicted and suffered from domestic violence, nevertheless, the council gave her an emergency accommodation in the outskirts of Croydon area.  The accommodation is small and she says:

“I have to travel 29 miles on public transport just to get to the nursery of my child or work which usually takes me around 2,5 hours one way.  The property is a tiny studio hardly fit to hold one person. There is a double bed that I share with my son and the mattress is old with springs biting into our backs and the boxes below it are broken and we keep falling in.  I have seen an a neighbour from upstairs going around with a knife
tucked in his trousers on a video footage. And I need to go upstairs in order to use the washing machine which is shared. All those news and arguments and shouts I’ve witnessed myself from behind closed doors make me feel really distressed, uncomfortable and scared and I don’t really feel like spending anytime there, especially I am 30 miles away from anyone I know and who could help me if something happened….”

This situation arises because of the Court.  We have witnessed many families being destroyed, children torn apart by being separated from their friends and family.

How is the Court responsible?

When the council applies for an eviction warrant, it is obviously issued without delay.  The tenant is then served with the warrant and is expected to move out.  However, he has an option of suspending the eviction warrant by filing an application notice N244 to the court which will give him enough time to find an alternative dwelling.  The court will never let this happen.  The tenant tries to file the application notice and is asked to phone the appointment line of Bow county court.  An appointment is then given to him to attend the court in person to pay and file the application to suspend the warrant of eviction.  The appointment date will be deliberately given two days prior to the eviction date in order to deprive the tenant to appeal if required.

This is a flagrant denial of justice.  If the tenant has sufficient exceptional grounds to stay in his house, the court should give him the right to be heard and put his case forward.  If for instance the eviction is on a Monday, the application will be filed by the court on Friday and heard by a District judge on the same day.  If the judge refuses, the tenant has no option but to go to the council on Monday (the eviction day) with his belongings and his family.  He will then be offered accommodation anywhere and he cannot refuse.  If he refuses, council will then discharge its duty.

This is pure victimisation.  It is clear that Bow County court is assisting the Council’s scheme of social cleansing.  It is therefore necessary to enlighten the fact that without the Court’s assistance, the Council will be unable to evict people so easily.

SOCIAL HOUSING NOT SOCIAL CLEANSING!

SOLIDARITY.

POLICE COMPLAINT ABOUT TWITTER ACCOUNT [malicious communication]

RACIST COMMENTS

THE COMMENTS ON TWITTER DATED 18 DECEMBER UNTIL 24 DECEMBER AMOUNT TO:LETTERS0001 LETTERS0002

RACISM, HATRED AND PERSONAL ATTACK ON MY CHARACTER. IT ISA BREACH OF 1988 Malicious Communications Act.lf a messagesent is grossly offensive, indecent, obscene, menacing or false it is irrelevant whether it was received. The offence is one of sending, so it is committed when the

sending takes place.The test for grossly offensive was stated by the House of Lords in DPP v Collins

20061 WLR 2223 to be whether the message would cause gross offence to those to whom it relates (in

that case ethnic minorities), who need not be the recipients. The case also said that it is justifiable

under ECHR Art 10(2) to prosecute somebody who has used the public telecommunications system to

leave racist messages.Section 127 can be used as an alternative offence to such crimes for example as hate

crime (including race, religion, disability, homophobic, sexual orientation, and transphobic crime), hacking

offences, cyber bullying, cyber stalking, amongst others.

I WAS FORCEFULLY AND VIOLENTLY EVICTED ON 18 DECEMBER 2014AT 6.4SAM.ATTHE END

OFTHESAME DAY, A TWITTER ACCOUNTWAS CREATED UNDER THE NAME OF

BRITISHBORN1.THE CONTENTS OF THAT ACCOUNT ARE MALICIOUS AND INTENTIONAL.

ITWAS TWEETED TO MY SUPORTERSAND VARIOUS CAMPAIGNERS. MY CHARACTER WAS

ASSASSINATED, I WAS TARGETED IN A RACIST MANNER.AS NEWHAM COUCNIL HAS EVICTED

MY FAMILY AND ME, THERE ISA POSSIBLITY THAT NEWHAM COUNCIL CREATED THE

ACCOUNT OR BY THE HOME OFFICE.

THETWITTERACCOUNTASSAIDABOVE HAS BEEN CREATED DELIBERATELY ON THE SAME

DAY IWAS EVICTED. NEWHAM COUNCIL ALSO MADE A DEFAMATORY PRESS STATEMENT ON

THEIR WEBSITE. THE TWEET STARTED: British Born@BritishBorn1 @Afhamlsmail Explain how the

school employed you as an ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT!!! in my country. Answer this.You are a burden to UK

Tax payers, ILLEGITIMATE, BLOOD-SUCKING, FAILED ASYLUM SEEKER, GO HOME!!!LETTHE

HOME OFFICE Give this ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT a place to sleep!!!British Born @BritishBorn1 Dec 18

@Afhamlsmail @FocusE15 @EResistance @redrumlisa British people Ist, ILLEGAL

IMMIGRANTS BLOOD-SUCKERS like you GO HOME!@Afhamlsmail @FocusE15 British people 1st,

ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS BLOOD-SUCKERS like you GO HOME!@NewhamLondon @chunkymark

@Afhamlsmail end supporting ILLEGAL FAILED ASYLUM SEEKER, COUNCIL us BRITS 1st GO

HOME AFHAM!! @FocusE15 stop supporting this dishonest ILLiGEL FAI LED ASYLUM SEEKER!

COUNCIL put us BRITS 1st Afham GO BACK

HOME@Afhamlsmail You have NO RIGHTS your a fraudster and you have abused Tax payers money,

GO BACK to where you came from!! British Born @BritishBorn1 Dec 18 @Afhamlsmail your British

unity is based on LIESwhy keep silent about you immigration status BRITIAN owes you nothing!!! MY

FATHER ISA MEMBER OF BRITISH EMPIREAND THE TWEET SPECIFIED AS

FOLLOWS:@Afhamlsmail You have mocked The Price ofWaise in that pic shaking hands as a FAI LED

ASYLUM SEEKER!!! Leave us Brits!!@Afhamlsmail Beingthe high standing FRAUDSTER you are sell you

the posh suit you wore wen you took our medal from the Prine British Born @BritishBorn1 Dec 22

@ukhomeoffice @FocusE15 Afhamismail is not

related to that man receiving the medal in his profile picture afham stole it. Don’t trust themTHE HOME

OFFICE ONLY KNOWSABOUTMYSTATUS. @Afhamlsmail Your children is your HOME countries

responsibility not the U KBritish Born @BritishBornl Dec 18 @Afhamlsmail The above means nothing!

Your a fraudster who like the rest will falsify

docuements to defraud our country!@Afhamlsmaii Stop moaning like a RAG DOLL leave our country and

piss off back to where you come from you FAI LED ASYLUM SEEKER!!!@Afhamismaii

@NewhamLondon @chunkymark You will do anything to shed bad light on our Brits Your a pest if

you ain’t happy GO!@Jasjan55Janice @FocusE15 @chakrabortty @StopCityAirport Stop supporting

this dishonest ILLEGAL FAILED ASYLUM SEEKER!!! COUNCIL put us BRITS@Jasjan55Janice @FocusE15 @chakrabortty@StopCityAirport WHO  ISAFHAMISLAM And why should This FAMILY GET

SPECIAL TREATMENT!!!@molesteeth @georgegallowayCont.. To FAILED ASYLUM

SEEKERS like AfhamISMAIL. You LOSER! You support the people who rapes or country! British

Born @BritishBornl Dec 20 @hackofalltrades Afhamismail is using you all to fight his own cause not

in relation too Focus E15, he is a Failed Asylum Seeker@Vote_UKIP I am very displeased to learn a

Failed Asylum seeker Afhamlsmail is ranting on and with no rights in the UK@TheSunNewspaperThank

you for opening our eyes to the Afhamlsmail story it

sickens me too know he is a failed Asylum Seeker in the UKBritish Born @BritishBornl Dec 22

@lynbrownmp@stephenctimmsAfhamlsmail is a threat to the UK as his demands are not being met

and could be a potential terrorist!’! IWAS ACCUSED TO BE TERRORIST. THATTWITTERACCOUNT

TRI ED TO PUT SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS ON ME.British Born @BritishBornl Dec 22

@newhammayor@ukhomeofficeAfhamlsmail could be a Terrorist FocusE15 are trying to house him

which is dangerous putting peeps lives at risk!

@FocusE15 @Jasjan55Janice @newhammayor Afhamlsmail is wanted by the Home Office he must

report Immediately, dont believe anything he tells uBritish Born @BritishBornl Dec 22 @FocusE15

@molesteeth @newhammayor @stephenctimms Afhamlsmail Has brained washed people to believe

he’s a victim, he’s dangerous!’ !@FocusE15 @molesteeth @newhammayor @stephenctimms

Afhamlsmail is wanted in his Home country don’t

allow him into your home he’s an EVIL ManlBritish

Born @BritishBornl Dec 22 @FocusE15 @molesteeth @newhammayor @stephenctimms

Afhamlsmail he is linked to fraudulent activities and is a major threat to the UK!!!@UKIP@bloggers4ukip

@Nigel_Farage I am utterly dismaid the Labour government has allowed a failed asylum seeker

Afhamimail into the UK British Born @BritishBornl

Dec 24 @Cultiv8HopeAfhamismail is a failed asylum

seeker wanted by the home office, is in fraudulent activities and has TB. BE WARNED keep awavll F

WAS A HATE SPEECH. THEY HAVE SPOKEN IN AN EXTREMISM MANNER. THEY HAVE TRIED TO

BRING UNCERTAINTYTO MY COMMUNITY. THEY HAVE ENGAGED IN SMEARING

CAMPAIGN.I REQUEST A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION AS ALL THIS IS LIE AND IT HAS TO BE INVESTIGATED. IT ISA HATE CAMPAIGN, CYBER BULLYING AND RACISM.PLEASE

CONTACT ME FOR MORE DETAILS.

Chronology:

15/1/2015 – MP Timms wrote to the Borough commander about a malicious communication complaint involving a twitter account created for the purpose of sanitising the character of Mr Ismail.  The suspects were believed to be either the Home Office, Newham council or the courts with substantive evidences.

22/1/2015 – The borough commander responded to the letter indicating that this was a criminal act which should be thoroughly investigated.

28/1/2015 – The complaint was formally given CAD number 4844/2801.  Officers called me to the police station for statements but shortly refused.  The actions of those officers are currently being examined by Mr Paul Emms.

29/1/2015 – Mr Ismail was harassed and threatened by the Home Office reporting staffs to withdraw the police complaint.

5/2/2015 – He was again victimised and threatened by other officers from home office (whom we complained in the past).  6 -7 officers surrounded him and threatened to withdraw the police complaint and to sign documents.

6/2/2015 – Mrs Ismail was asked to unlawfully report and to come to the Home office premises.  This was intentionally done to victimise her because of the pending police complaint.

9/2/2015 – The subsistence support for the family and children was suspended.  The Living needs cannot be met.

Based on the above, the home office is the only suspect who has tried to threaten and victimise us following that police complaint with the assistance of Newham council.  In other words, they can be the responsible of that twitter account #Britishborn1.

Our lives is now at risks from those individuals within those agencies.

BRITISHBORN1 [Twitter account created on 18/12/2014 by Home Office & Newham Council]

@BritishBorn1 is blocked

Afhamismail owe rent money & is homeless he’s into fraudulent activities & hiding from the Home Office. He blames gov 4 all

AfhamISMAIL is a failed asylum seeker wanted by the home office, he became not paying his rent and has TB stay away from him!

AfhamISMAIL owes money to the landlord ask him why he didn’t pay his rent!! He put his own family in danger? Wanted by home off

AfhamISMAIL has also worked in our school with children whilst infected with TB & isn’t entitled to state!

AfhamISMAIL is a failed asylum seeker who is a major burden on the UK state, he’s wanted by the Home Office to

Afhamismail is a failed asylum seeker wanted by the home office, & is in fraudulent activities and has TB. BE WARNED keep away!

Afhamismail did not disclose that he has TB and is working in a school with children!!!

the UK has gone to pot and the Labour government need to act now Re: Afhamismail

afhamismail has demanded housing, benefits & sued the sun as a failed asylum seeker!!

how can afhamismail be allowed to work in our school unvetted? this is shocking & unfair

0 replies . 0 retweets 0 favourites

Reply
Retweet Retweeted
Favourite Favourited

Afhamismail is a threat to the UK and a major burden to the benefits system. i am very angry

I am utterly dismaid the Labour government has allowed a failed asylum seeker Afhamimail into the UK

afhamismail is a professional fraduster and this document in not genuine!!! BEWARNED!!!

AfhamIsmail he is linked to fraudulent activities and is a major threat to the UK!!!

AfhamIsmail is usong people to promote his LIES and hide from the HOME OFFICE.

AfhamIsmail is wanted in his Home country don’t allow him into your home he’s an EVIL Man!

AfhamIsmail Has brained washed people to believe he’s a victim, he’s dangerous!!!

AfhamIsmail is wanted by the Home Office, he is using his children to pity him!!! So Don’t

AfhamIsmail is wanted by the Home Office he must report Immediately, dont believe anything he tells u

Afhamismail is not related to that man receiving the medal in his profile picture afham stole it. Don’t trust them!!

AfhamIsmail could be a Terrorist FocusE15 are trying to house him which is dangerous putting peeps lives at risk!

AfhamIsmail is a threat to the UK as failed Asylum Seeker working at Maryland school in Newham!!!

AfhamIsmail is a threat to the UK as his demands are not being met and could be a potential terrorist!!!

Privilege defence sees asylum seekers' £850k libel claim against The Sun struck out

Thank you for opening our eyes to the AfhamIsmail story it sickens me too know he is a failed Asylum Seeker in the UK

£850k-libel-claim-against-sun-over-report-based-court-documents-struck-out

Not only that but he is working in Newham at Maryland school how can this be? as he is a Failed Asylum seeker it angers me

I am very displeased to learn a Failed Asylum seeker AfhamIsmail is ranting on and with no rights in the UK

0

£850k-libel-claim-against-sun-over-report-based-court-documents-struck-out

£850k-libel-claim-against-sun-over-report-based-court-documents-struck-out

If i were you i would inspect him and the reasons about his rent arrears leading to his homelessness

Afhamismail is using you all to fight his own cause not in relation too Focus E15, he is a Failed Asylum Seeker

£850k-libel-claim-against-sun-over-report-based-court-documents-struck-out

Afhamismail is using you all, for a cause that is not related too cause!!!

£850k-libel-claim-against-sun-over-report-based-court-documents-struck-out

All a putting pity on AfhamISMAIL who has demanded for our system and has NO why is no one asking to his docs on owing rent

I am not using anything other than to expose Migrant how put a burden on our system AfhamISMAIL has abused our system

1st do your research and get to the reason of how he was evicted, ask AfhamISMAIL what he did with the rent dosh

AfhamISMAIL three children are used to by him as a front to make gulable people like to support their LIES!

Cont.. To FAILED ASYLUM SEEKERS like AfhamISMAIL. You LOSER! You support the people who rapes or country!

How AfhamIsmail a Teaching Assistant at Maryland School has now ended up Homeless? Clearly you have the answers!

Afhamismail should provide all docs related to this familes homelessness so the public can understand

Your supporting Afhamismail who is a burden on our system? You happily support a Failed Asylum Seeker

Re: AfhamIsmail has placed a burden on our system, how is this allowed?

Re: AfhamIsmail, how did they become homeless? Did they pay there rent?

I want answers how did the failed asylum seeker become homeless?

How can AfhamIsmail a Failed Asylum seeker work in Maryland School?

Re: AfhamIsmail, Privilege defence sees asylum seekers £850k-libel-c

Re: AfhamIsmail, Privilege defence sees asylum seekers £850k-libel-c

Re: AfhamIsmail, Privilege defence sees asylum seekers £850k-libel-c

Re: AfhamIsmail, Privilege defence sees asylum seekers £850k-libel-c stop support these Illegal Peeps

Re: AfhamIsmail, Privilege defence sees asylum seekers £850k-libel-c

Re: AFHAM Ismail, Privilege defence sees asylum seekers £850k-libel-c

Privilege Afham Ismail family are FAILED asylum seekers & abusing our UK system

AFHAMISLAM should tell you he is a FAILED ASYLUM SEEKER WHO HAS ABUSED our system!

WHO IS AFHAMISLAM? And why should This FAMILY GET SPECIAL TREATMENT!!!

I’m upset this family NON Brits making demands & worked in our school unvetted

Stop supporting this dishonest ILLEGAL FAILED ASYLUM SEEKER!!! COUNCIL put us BRITS

They are all telling LIES I would check the family out they are defrauding our British country!!!

This letter I believe you wrote yourself! Prove your status to the officials!! You FAILED ASYLUM SEEKER!!!

Show us your papers not the FAKE ones you make!!

Where is our TAX PAYERS Money! You stole? VET this family they are a burden on us BRITS!!

you want to abuse our system! I hope the government will send the Home Office van ur way!!!

I bet you told your child to write that to make your British workers look bad just becoz

You will do anything to shed bad light on our Brits? Your a pest if you ain’t happy GO!

cont…. You lot ever do is make demands when you have no rights in the UK? Your rich really aren’t you

I know your sort, come steel our money build homes back home them my country has to clean up your shit you and

Stop moaning like a RAG DOLL leave our country and piss off back to where you come from you FAILED ASYLUM SEEKER!!!

Being the high standing FRAUDSTER you are sell you the posh suit you wore wen you took our medal from the Prine

Placing a strain on the UK BRITS who serve our country and pay there way, STOP RAPEING the BENEFITS GO HOME

0 replies . 0 retweets 0 favourites

FAILED ASYLUM SEEKERS will do anything to harm our innocent BRITS, TAX PAYERS and UK CITIZENS. Your an INFIDEL

My friend had to be CRB checked to work in a school how comes this illegal immigrant didnt get vetted

This is very upsetting to know this family NON Brits are making these demands and worked in a school

The parents are responsible and I bet that they have rent arrears and shipped the money back home!

cont….. Illegal Immigrants who have no grounds to be here demanding and abusing our system!

He’s a FAILED ASYLUM SEEKER, if he stays I’ll protest until he goes, we Brits are fed up off

The above means nothing! Your a fraudster who like the rest will falsify docuements to defraud our country!

0 replies . 0 retweets 0 favourites

Reply
Retweet Retweeted

YOUR AN ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT making demands not entitled to u show them ur UK status or GO!

AFHAMISMAIL should show everyone his IMMIGRATION status ASAP! I won’t stop my protest!!!

Your children is your HOME countries responsibility not the UK

You have mocked The Price of Walse in that pic shaking hands as a FAILED ASYLUM SEEKER!!! Leave us Brits!!

your British unity is based on LIES why keep silent about you immigration status BRITIAN owes you nothing!!!

Stop demanding what you are NOT entitled too. The government in your country should help u. British people 1st!!

You have NO RIGHTS your a fraudster and you have abused Tax payers money, GO BACK to where you came from!!

stop supporting this dishonest ILLIGEL FAILED ASYLUM SEEKER!!! COUNCIL put us BRITS 1st Afham GO BACK HOME

 

: stop supporting this dishonest ILLIGEL FAILED ASYLUM SEEKER! COUNCIL put us BRITS 1st Afham GO BACK HOME

end supporting ILLEGAL FAILED ASYLUM SEEKER, COUNCIL us BRITS 1st GO HOME AFHAM!!

is a member of our campaign. His family were terrified by violent eviction carried out at dawn, despite getting reprieve!

tell the public the truth, working in our schools unchecked with our children is alarming!

British people 1st, ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS & BLOOD-SUCKERS like you GO HOME!

British people 1st, ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS & BLOOD-SUCKERS like you GO HOME!

You are supporting an ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT, FAILED ASYLUM SEEKER!!!

LET THE HOME OFFICE Give this ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT a place to sleep!!!

You are a burden to UK Tax payers, ILLEGITIMATE, BLOOD-SUCKING, FAILED ASYLUM SEEKER, GO HOME!!!

Explain how the school employed you as an ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT!!! in my country. Answer this.

RAINER HUGHES SOLICITORS

Home

DARREN RAWLINS

Darren is familiar with the District and Circuit Judges on the South Eastern Circuit.

He also has a vast amount of experience of advocacy before Queen’s Bench Masters,

Chancery Masters at the Royal Courts of Justice (AS CONFIRMED IN HIS PROFILE)

UNDER HIS INSTRUCTIONS, PEOPLE WITH GUNS WERE SENT TO OUR HOUSE AT DAWN TO EVICT CHILDREN AND FAMILIES.

9 January 2015

To

Rainer Hughes Solicitors

Darren Rawlins

Dear Sir,

Thank you for your letter dated 7 January 2015. I would like to clarify certain points:

“The Court sealed the draft order of HHJ Walden-Smith”.

The hearing was held on 11 December 2014 and HHJ Walden-Smith advised you during the court

hearing to draft her order, send it to parties for approval and afterwards to the court for it to be

sealed. You admit that you have drafted the order (without our approval) and the court sealed it.

Pursuant to CPR, you should have sent the draft order for us to confirm our agreement to the so that it

can be provided to the Court for approval and sealing. HHJ Walden-Smith did advise you to do so

pursuant to Rule 40b. Your explanation does not make sense as we requested you for the draft order

on 15/12/2014 and instead of sending us the order itself, you knowingly and maliciously sent the draft

order! This is an unprofessional and intentional act. In accordance to the general rule, the court will

serve judgments and orders, however, where a judgement or order has been drawn up by a party, the

party must retain a copy at the court and sufficient copies on himself and on the other parties. Once

order is sealed, then the order is served by the court. As you have not served your drafted order on

the same day you drew it up, you have breached your duties under Rule 6.3.

On 15 December 2014, you agreed that you made an application for the court to have the possession

order transferred to the High court. You still did not serve the application on us and neither urgent

order you received from the court. You drafted the order on the N244 for the possession order to be

transferred to the high court and that order was not served on us prior to putting it in front of DJ Judge

North.

You indicated that your firm has followed the proper procedures to gain possession of the property.

This is wholly incorrect. You agreed in your letter that you acted upon the instructions of RHP

Services and not Ismail Natha. RHP Services is a service provider of Newham council under S17

Children Act 1989. As such, in the round, you confirm that Newham council has advised RHP

Services to seek possession of the property. In short, you represented Newham Council in this

possession proceedings, and to avoid any dispute of Human Rights, you used Ismail Natha’s name.

As the above confirms, you have not used the proper channels to seek repossession. You have

instead used deception. You further instructed RHP Services to proceed with an illegal entry on 10th

November 2014 despite knowing that a high court order was obtained to stay the eviction.

Furthermore, you communicated with the Home office, Mr Clifford Kirsch, to start possession

proceedings / notice to quit etc…

You provided false information in court on 11 September 2014 despite we informed the judge. You

deliberately misguided the judge by your false representations such as; you have not been instructed

by RHP Services. Now in your letter, you are clearly confirming that you were as you believe that

the case is finished. This is deception.If the court transferred the possession order to the high court

on 15 December 2014, you should have served this order on us or informed us before seeking a

direction from Master Eyre. You have used deception to reach unlawful aims.

Can you confirm who attended the meeting with Master Eyre on 16 December 2014?

The case is not closed and your actins should be examined by Solicitors Regulations Authority as we

understand that your subsequent actions after the complaint have been carried out only to obstruct

the course of justice and the complaint.

We urge the SRA to carefully look into Rainer Hughes Solicitors conduct in this case. More precisely,

we request the SRA to:

Investigate why draft orders were served to the court without consent of all parties?

Investigate the actions of Rainer Hughes Solicitors in this particular case.

Investigate the communications Rainer Hughes had with the home office and the Newham

council in this particular case.

If RHP Services has instructed Rainer Hughes, why this was not put forward on 11 September

2014 and denied by them?

I have provided some evidences to show how Rainer Hughes used deception in this case.

An inquiry into their actions is a requirement.

Newham Council

RHP Services (S17 Housing provider)

Ismail Natha

(Shahi Development Ltd Property Developer)

Owns many properties

Takes advice from Newham Council

and Home office

Instructed Rainer Hughes Solicitors

Darren Rawlins (Solicitor)

Darren is familiar with the District and Circuit Judges on the South Eastern Circuit.

He also has a vast amount of experience of advocacy before Queen’s Bench Masters,

Chancery Masters at the Royal Courts of Justice.

Convinced Master Eyre to order a writ of possession without notice to us

Yours faithfully,

Mr and Mrs Ismail

9_January_2015

Central London County Court’s procedural irregularities

6 November 2014

Today, I attempted to file an appeal in CLCC against a decision of
District Judge Reeves for not suspending an eviction notice without
a hearing. I am on fee remission.

The fee remission was refused with no reason despite all documents
submitted and the court refused to issue the appeal. I am a
disabled person which renders me vulnerable and lack of capacity.
the court is aware of this. I was told to wait for over 3 hours
until I was informed that a judge under the name of HHJ Saggerson
will hear me. I however lack capacity. I did not eat or drink
anything since morning I was at court.

——————————————————————————————————

I write as a mother of 3 minor children, all born in the UK.  We were given a possession order by the Bow County Court on 11th September 2014 and an eviction order on 29th September 2014.  We appealed against the order as we have been given alternative accommodation the lawfulness and proportionality of the orders were not assessed by a Circuit Judge.  Unfortunately, I am not represented by a solicitor and I am alone in this hardship.  I humbly apologise for sending an email to QBDutyClerk@hmcts.gsi.gov.ukas I have no other option due to the emergency of the matter and I am worried for my children.

 

An appeal was filed on 1st October 2014 including a stay of the eviction warrant pending the determination of the appeal.  The Central London county Court kept the appeal and did not put it to the Circuit judge on time before the eviction scheduled for 10th November 2014 at 8am.  In the circumstance that we do not have alternative accommodation (as we were waiting for the appeal) and the fact that children will be homeless, we sought help from Court of Appeal.  They said that the jurisdiction lies in the high Court and the High Court said the jurisdiction lies on the Court of Appeal.  The County Court suddenly provided a senior judge’s order indicating that there will be a permission to appeal hearing on Friday 14th September 2014.

 

Hence, we asked for the eviction to be suspended pending that hearing.  We were refused.  We do not understand the reason why. 

 

It is imperative to suspend the eviction as we have been provided with an order indicating that a hearing will take place.  That appeal hearing consists of both appeal against the district judge’s order and the stay of the eviction.

_________________________________________________________________________

Re:  Eviction warrant scheduled for 10th November 2014

Dear Sirs,

As you may be aware, an appeal was made against DJ North’s order on 1st October 2014 and subsequent to the refusal of DJ Reeves to suspend the warrant of eviction, an appeal of his order was made to Central London County court on 6th November 2014.  This particular appeal was apparently heard by HHJ Saggerson in my absence.  I understand that Mr Ismail lacked capacity to conduct such hearing. 

I also understand that HHJ Saggerson has not sealed his order yet and therefore we are not in receipt of it.  In such circumstances, as the appeal is pending for determination and hearing and the order of HHJ Saggerson has not been received, any attempt to proceed with the eviction on Monday will be against the natural course of justice.

It is in the interest of justice for you to take necessary directions to proceed with your eviction warrant.  If you are in receipt of those directions from A Circuit Judge, please send us the order so we can take further steps next week.  In the meantime, we are in the same accommodation as no order has been made by a higher court with regards to both appeals (That is, the 1st October appeal and the 6th November appeal).  I reckon that you understand the procedures and will follow the correct course of justice. 

Finally, any attempt to obstruct our day to day life on Monday 10th November will amount to an unlawful interference with our private and family life and to the children.  If you are reluctant to attend the property on Monday, please send me a copy of the order of the circuit judge or any high court judge which allows you to proceed with the eviction. 

I reiterate that until the appeal is pending and has not been determined by a circuit judge and until the sealed order of HHJ Saggerson is not received and any further appeals determined by higher courts, we remain in the property unless you substantiate that your actions are lawful.

 

In those circumstances, I will be thankful if you could order an interim relief in this regard as irrevocable damage will be caused to the children who will be street homeless.   The eviction will occur on Monday morning at 8am despite there is an appeal hearing on Friday 14th November.  I have attached the order for your consideration.

_______________________________________________________________________________

TO STEPHEN TIMMS MP

Dear Sir

Please see attached order and application.  it is called out of hour application which has to be done by a solicitor.  I take debts and did it to save my family and children.  I do not know how to repay that.

You are however already aware that despite there will be an appeal hearing this Friday 14th Nov 2014, Bow county court did not suspend the eviction.  Focus E15 Mothers assisted me with over 50 people this morning.  They spoke and resisted the bailiffs as they were trying to act despite there was a court’s order….  The bailiffs were very abusive and when police was called, they refused to come.  they disrespected High court’s orders.  E15 Focus witnessed everything and recorded the whole incident.

I now request your assistance and urgent action to push the council to provide me with an alternative accommodation until assessments of my needs and my children’s needs are carried out. 

I reckon that you also thought that I will be evicted.  I am still in my home at 47b Colchester Ave, E12 5LF.

Regards

Mr Ismail


From: XXXXXXXXXXXX
To: XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Subject: RE: From Mr/Mrs Ismail – E12 5LF (URGENT)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:35:46 +0000

Thank you for your email. What is the latest?

 

I have never heard of a court order being processes at 11 pm on a Sunday evening. How did you receive it, and where are you now?

 

Ali

 

From: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Sent: 10 November 2014 13:09
To: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Subject: From Mr/Mrs Ismail – E12 5LF (URGENT)

 Dear Sir,

Today morning as you are aware that an eviction was scheduled for 8am.  I am currently assisted by Focus E15.  They all came to my address and assisting me.  They asked me whether you know these matters, but I did not tell much…

Despite I got an urgent court order on Sunday at 11pm that eviction was suspended, the bailiffs and other people attended my property to put me and my family out on the streets.    the bailiffs claim that the order was fake.

I hope you will now help me in this situation.  Focus E15 will proceed to help me by pressurising the council to give me another accommodation as I am disabled with small children.  They are presently putting a barricade on my door as they do not trust the bow county court’s bailiffs. I rely upon your cooperation and I will tell those supporting me that you are with us as well.

I await your response.

Regards

Mr/Mrs Ismail

__________________________________________________________________________high court order for suspension fo eviction

Bow County Court’s illegal Eviction and Institutional Child Abuse

Orders

8th November 2014     To,     Bow county Court bailiffs  (BLF 6) Bow County court Central London County court Rainer Hughes RHP Services Bow County Court Judges (due to the urgency and your unusual approach)     Dear Sirs,

You should be aware pursuant to Michael Morgan’s letter dated 9th October 2014 that an appeal against DJ North’s order dated 11th September 2014 and against the eviction warrant dated 29th September 2014 was filed on 1st October 2014 at the Central London County court.

On 7th November 2014, a senior judge of the County Court ordered for a permission to appeal hearing to take place on 14th November 2014 at 10am alongside with the appeal against the warrant of eviction.

In such circumstances, an eviction cannot proceed on Monday 10th November 2014 at 8am in line with the Overriding objective of the CPR and advise you Not to interfere with the proper administration of justice by attending the property.  You would probably argue as per Lynn Harvey’s email dated 7th November 2014 that HHJ Saggerson has refused to suspend the warrant of eviction.  However, his order dated 6th November 2014 is invalid as it does not bear the court’s seal.  It is nevertheless noted that the permission to appeal order dated 7th November 2014 is sealed and valid.  The sealed appellant’s notice was also provided.

We also refer to the Court of Appeal’s deputy master’s directions dated 7th November 2014 as follows:

“…A sealed order has not been provided…”

The Registry and Justice Davies indicated that the process you are following is invalid and amounts to an abuse of process.  They noted that you have acted in a timely manner to obstruct the course of justice by misusing your judicial positions.  They cannot identify which scheme and CPR you have followed.

We understand that you may have some issues with our family as previously you assaulted the children during a past eviction and you attempted to enter the property forcefully and illegally by manhandling us and the children.  As this matter is with the police for a thorough investigation, you are carrying out these actions in a conspiracy manner targeting us and to obstruct the police’s duties.

Therefore, your court is still subject to criminal investigations and as explained above, you are in the obligation to follow the law and to avoid any public attention in this matter.  The situation will worsen if you are reluctant to proceed with those unlawful actions.

Finally, please note that your eviction warrant dated 29th September 2014 was not served by hand and was not sealed or did not contain a wet signature which renders it invalid. (Pursuant to the advice of my probono legal adviser).

Please see attached sealed appellant’s notice and order dated 7th November 2014.

To Rainer Hughes:  Please contact the bailiffs for further actions.

Yours faithfully,

Mr and Mrs Ismail

___________________________________________________________________________________

Forest Gate Police Station

Dear All,

Please find attached email and documents.  As you are aware of those matters, Bow County court has committed a series of abuse of public trust and individual staffs have engaged in criminal conspiracies.  That complaint is still pending with DPS.  Those complaints were concealed for a long time by Alan Duncan PC and others.  But currently this is being under investigation by Sergeant Nicholas.  The matter with regards to High court and senior judiciary is also pending for investigation with regards to perjury.

Therefore, we believe that you owe the same duty to protect the public as us due to our vulnerability and the children’s involvement.  Those court officers are attempting to misused the procedures.  I understand that you will tell me that it is a judicial matter, but they are trying to harm us in an illegal manner (as can be seen below).

We do not want to be harassed as in 2012, and we seek urgent protection from harassment.   Please feel free to communicate by email.  We have been told by yourself that these complaints should be made in writing.  As per the below explanation and attached documents, the bow county court is acting against the law.

Yours faithfully,

Mr and Mrs Ismail

_________________________________________________________________________________

To

ECHR

 Dear Sirs,

Thank you for your fax dated 7th November 2014.  You indicate that “the Rule 39 applies only when an applicant is faced with serious and irreparable damage”.  We understand that the damage can be a threat to the applicant’s life or an ill-treatment by Article 3 of the Convention.  In some circumstances, it can apply to right to respect private and family life. 

Exceptionally, Rule 39 has been applied in cases that engage Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life), where there is a potentially irreparable risk to private or family life.

In this particular circumstance, we received an order yesterday for a permission to appeal hearing scheduled for 14th November 2014.  That appeal relates to the appeal against  a possession order and the warrant of eviction.  however, the domestic court has indeed given a trial date but has not suspended the warrant for eviction.  In this case, the children and our family will be street homeless and will not have the opportunity to be heard as we will be evicted on Monday 10th November.  The simple fact that if there is a hearing on 14th November with regards to the eviction, how can we be evicted on 10th November?

This factual circumstance amount a flagrant denial of justice and a serious breach of Article 6 and 8 of the Convention.  There is therefore a risk of irreparable damage as the fundamental rights of the applicants are at stake. 

Having viewed the policy of the ECHR on Rule 39, it is clear that:

Eviction complaints falls outside Rule 39 unless there is an Article 3 complaint of extreme hardship/harm such as children being put out on the street.

In this case, as indicated to you, our children will be put on the streets and an urgent interim measure is required to prevent this from happening.  The domestic courts have refused to suspend the eviction despite an appeal is due to be heard on 14th November 2014.

We await your urgent reply as the eviction will take place on 10th November 2014 at 8am.  Please note that the applicant is not Mr Afham J Ismail but are the children under the name of Ayman Ismail , Usman Ismail and Imran Ismail.

Yours sincerely,

Mr and Mrs Ismail (on behalf of the applicants as children)

LORD JUSTICE RICHARD AIKENS MISCONDUCTS AND ASSISTING TO PERJURY / PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE

Dismissal 21 (a) (b) following further info Ismail

Court Order (1)

Complaint about Lord Justice Aikens

The judicial oath provides:

“I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of this Realm, without fear or favour, affection or ill-will.”

  1. Aikens LJ has misused his judicial status by way of intimidation, harassment and victimization.

 

“Harassment” occurs when one person perpetrates unwanted conduct (including sexual conduct) related to one or more of another person’s protected characteristics which has the purpose or effect of violating that other person’s dignity and/or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for that other person.

The judge has failed to ensure that his conduct, in the court, maintains and enhances the confidence of the public, the legal profession and litigants, in the impartiality of the judge and of the judiciary.

His conduct relates to the making of his decision on a day where the Court of Appeal was not sitting.  His conduct also relates to the fact that he made his decision IN PRIVATE.  He has created an intimidating atmosphere for the applicants as 3 minor children by imposing on them civil restraint orders in their absence.  The judge has also misused his judicial position by damaging the characters of the children concerned without giving them the opportunity to be heard.  Please note that this complaint does not relate to a case management or case decision, but it relates entirely to the way the judge has treated litigants, which indeed is in contrary to his judicial oath.

  1. Harassment, victimisation and bullying of others by means of words and/or behaviour are unacceptable. As the words of the judicial oath make clear, the principles of exercising equality and fairness of treatment have always been fundamental to the role and conduct of the judiciary when carrying out their judicial functions. Conduct giving rise to harassment, victimisation and/or bullying may take place face to face, or by other means of communication such as a telephone call, letter…

Lord Justice Aikens has failed in his duty to act fairly without having the need to victimize us as litigants. The fairness of treatment has not been shown in his conduct when he issued civil restraint orders on the children. He deprived them of an oral hearing and acceded to the decision of Stuart Isaacs QC who is currently subject to have assisted perjury.

Lord Justice Aikens has abused his judicial discretion.   He has abused his judicial discretion to protect himself and other judges from civil and criminal liability for being unduly influenced, such as by bribery, intimidation or cronyism.  He has directly assisted Deputy Judge Isaacs QC who has been involved in perjury. 

  1. Instead of accommodating to the lack of legal knowledge of lay persons who either cannot afford a lawyer, or who don’t trust lawyers who are subject to the control of the courts, Aikens LJ systematically discriminate and victimise against litigants such as ourselves who appear pro se or in propria persona, often dismissing their petitions or motions out of hand, regardless of their merits. That is abuse of judicial discretion.
  1. Lord Justice Aikens has successfully attempted in his act to make us afraid by way of Civil Restraint orders made IN PRIVATE. His actions can be considered as acts of bullying. “Bullying” carries its normal meaning. It consists of conduct that is offensive, intimidating, malicious and/or insulting and which has the purpose or effect of undermining, humiliating, and/or frightening another person. It may amount to a misuse or abuse of power.
  1. A judge shall, in his or her personal relations with individual members of the legal profession who practise regularly in the judge’s court, avoid situations which might reasonably give rise to the suspicion or appearance of favouritism or partiality. Aikens LJ has favoured public authorities by declaring that their acts of perjury were correct, and by ignoring the evidences provided. The actions of Aikens LJ are biased and are against his judicial oath. He has indeed treated us as Muslims who should be treated unequal and has discriminated us on the basis that we are wrong. Aikens LJ has misused his judicial status by his act of ‘cover up’ his colleagues in Administrative Court. As we have brought several acts of misbehaviour in public office by judiciary members, Aikens LJ and others have threatened us with civil restraint orders which amounts to bully and have no merits whatsoever according to natural justice.
  1. A judge’s conduct in court should uphold the status of judicial office, the commitment made in the judicial oath and the confidence of litigants in particular and the public in general. Lord Justice Aikens has failed to be courteous, patient, tolerant and respect the dignity of us. The judge should ensure that no one in court is exposed to any display of bias or prejudice on grounds said in the Bangalore principle entitled “equality” to include but not to be limited to “race, colour, sex, religion, national origin, caste, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, social and economic status and other like causes”. There should be no bias or prejudice on those grounds, which are described in the principles as “irrelevant grounds”.
  1. Aikens LJ has unlawfully discriminated us and our children. He has discriminated Mr Ismail who is a disabled and therefore breached the Equality Act 2010. Unlawful discrimination may also occur if a disabled person is treated unfavourably because of something arising in consequence of his or her disability, which cannot be shown to be a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim (s.15). The acts of Aikens LJ to disregard the Community Care Assessment of Mr Ismail which clearly mentioned and elaborated about his disability, the hospital confirmations and reports and other documents are unlawful. His act of imposing civil restraint orders on people who lack capacity such as the children and Mr Ismail is unlawful by way of irrationality and discrimination.
  1. The equality duty (s.149) requires public authorities, in the exercise of their public functions, to have due regard to eliminate prohibited discrimination, harassment and victimisation, and advance equality of opportunity and foster good relations between different groups of people. We believe that the OJC will eliminate these acts of discrimination which exist among certain judges.
  1. Judges should always take care that their conduct, official or private, does not undermine their institutional or individual independence, or the public appearance of independence. Lord Justice Aikens has failed to act according to judicial independence which is a prerequisite to the rule of law and a fundamental guarantee to fair trial. By depriving the children of a fair trial shows that he has not been independent of judicial colleagues and therefore is solely responsible for his decisions.
  1. Lord Justice Aikens has failed to respect children’s best interests and if these points are revealed to the public, anybody will conclude that Aikens LJ is incorrect. If a public opinion is asked through a website, the majority of the public will object to his order as he has simply encouraged authorities to make false representations (CPR 81). Literally, Aikens LJ is also the object to committal as he is not immunized from such due to his status as a judge.
  1. Aiken LJ sat Privately and ordered that an urgent interim relief was granted. However, no urgent relief was sought by us. The OJC advised that certain part of Stuart Isaacs QC allegations of perjury should be dealt at an appeal, having done such, Lord Justice Aikens has also contributed to the same acts. He has disregarded all the evidences in front of him due to his malicious intention and animosity. These acts are part of an institutional racism for which we are victims of.
  1. The judge has relied upon misrepresentation. He has been biased, partial and lacks integrity. He has failed to follow the six principles set for a judge:

(i) Judicial independence is a prerequisite to the rule of law and a fundamental guarantee of a fair trial. A judge shall therefore uphold and exemplify judicial independence in both its individual and institutional aspects.

(ii) Impartiality is essential to the proper discharge of the judicial office. It applies not only to the decision itself but also to the process by which the decision is made.

(iii) Integrity is essential to the proper discharge of the judicial office.

(v) Ensuring equality of treatment to all before the courts is essential to the due performance of the judicial office.

(vi) Competence and diligence are prerequisites to the due performance of judicial office.

This complaint should be considered alongside the complaint of Stuart Isaacs QC.

—————————————————————————

I have gone through your letter dated 4 October 2013 which summarized our complaint against LJ Aikens and dismissed part of the complaint.

Your summary of complaint does not clearly outlined the points raised in the original complaint and I have attached the complaint below in bold.

Firstly, LJ Aikens did not conduct a hearing but he made his paper decision in private (as attached) on a day where the Court of Appeal was not sitting (as attached).

This action of making his decision in private made us feel prejudiced and intimidated as litigants in person and asylum seekers, most importantly, as vulnerable people.  His actions of imposing civil restraint orders in our absence to the children are victimizing and go against his judicial oath as it is clear that he has treated us unfairly.

LJ Aikens has abused his judicial discretion to protect himself and other judges from civil and criminal liability for being unduly influenced, such as by bribery, intimidation or cronyism.  He has directly assisted Deputy Judge Isaacs QC who has been involved in perjury.

The judge has used the method of intimidation to protect other judges and court staffs.

Please note the typological error in paragraph number 5 of my complaint.  LJ Aikens has treated us unequally as Muslims Asylum Seekers and not only Muslims.  We apologise and will be grateful if you could amend this in your summary of complaint.

LJ Aikens does not respect Human Rights Act 1998 and he has failed to be courteous.  He treated us unfairly as Muslims Asylum Seekers who are vulnerable.

He was covering up his colleagues by refusing oral hearing and by imposing civil restraint orders.  He made those acts privately which therefore concludes that there has been high level of corruption.

We will appreciate if you could amend the summary of your complaint and to read the below complaint carefully.  LJ Aikens actions are a misconduct in public office and perverted the course of justice.

With regards to criminal actions against the Lord Justice and other people involved in this matter, please advise us whether police has to be involved or for us to proceed with a complaint. We understand that the JCIO has advised us to make a police complaint about Mr Isaacs QC.  We are supported by some highly influential Non Government organizations (NGOs) who are prepared to assist us to make the complaint and investigation upon your response and the conclusion of this particular complaint.

We have informed the NGOs to await your conclusion of this complaint.

__________________________________________________

NEWHAM COUNCIL COMPLAINTS

My name is Afham Ismail. I live in Newham for over 6 years. I am a Special Needs Teaching Assistant and my wife is a qualified Teacher in the UK. I am a disabled. I used to live in Westminster and subsequently in Lewisham. We were working in this borough and then moved to Stratford E15. Since 2010, we were prevented to work and earn a decent living without benefits. We were evicted forcefully in 2012 by over 5 bailiffs and over 10 police officers. There were 2 minor children and a small baby of 3 weeks who were thrown out physically on the street as we found out that a fraudulent judge made a decision for possession.
We also found out several illegal activities such as selling court files to media, fabricating court orders and judges are colleagues of barristers and solicitors or they were themselves working with them. We also discovered that judges worked as ex-counsels of local authorities. There were also false documents submitted to the court by Newham Children Services which amount to perjury. When complained to judges, they tried to cover up and concealed those criminal acts. They then threatened us that we will be put in prison if we proceed. When police was informed with evidence, we were again threatened by them.
These incidents led us to be forcefully evicted in 2012.
In May 2014, police officers attended our present accommodation at 1am to exploit our children and putting hands inside their blankets. Newham Children services also conspired to take children into custody without any reason.
Presently, E15 Focus Mothers assisted us and because of them, our family was saved from being victimised, harassed and unlawfully targeted. I am sincerely grateful to them. Even if those authorities tried to cover up, I will proceed with those complaints to hold them accountable for their actions. I will support those who need help and as activist, I will continue to assist everybody.

With best regards

 

 

 

Newham council is well-known for its controversial practices and not following the national Framework and policies governed by Parliament and legislations.  Migrants who work for that borough implement their own policies and laws which they learnt from where they come form.  They are harmful to human rights and therefore breach the UK’s dignity and sovereignty.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/contempt_of_court_and_newham_cou

Dear Newham Borough Council,

1. Could you provide me your complaints procedure and policies? I
have been informed by Pauline Jones, Complaints and Member
Enquiries Lead that “Court proceedings override the complaints
procedure”. However those court proceedings involved Newham council
council whose social workers have provided fraudulent information
against children to mislead the court. this amounted to a contempt
of court. Newham council has obtained several court orders through
unlawful manners. Please see below email for you to understand the
circumstance which has led to this FOI request:

“Dear Madam,

I refer to your letter dated 24 October 2014 in which you have
copied the contents of your letter dated 3rd December 2012.
Therefore, those contents are unmeritorious and have been disputed
with evidence. First and foremost, the complaints made about Marc
Davis and Michael MacKay do not have any bearing on your extensive
justification with regards to accommodations and irrelevant dates.
We have not complained about accommodation to you and we are not
interested in those discussions which show your incompetency as a
Complaints Lead Member.

Some of your contents are false and the reasons are as follows:

1. You claim that on 3rd October 2012, an accommodation offer to
Egham Road was provided. There was no offer of accommodation and
please provide us with the evidence that there was an offer at that
address and the evidence that we have refused as you claim. We have
also requested to reconsider offers provided. In any circumstance,
those offers do not override S17 Duties. However, we are not
justifying this as you are only speculating irrelevant personal
issues.

2. Could you provide me a copy of that “corporate complaint” you
refer to in your letter as a matter of urgency?

3. Your assumption indicates that Court proceedings override
complaints procedures. Could you please provide the complaint
procedure and governing policies and legislations which
substantiate this? However, we have been informed by JCIO that as
those judges you mentioned in your letter have worked together with
your organisation as part of a group of institutional racism to
cover up the misconducts and harmful activities against families
and children, they are liable for prosecution under Perjury Act
1911 for perverting the course of justice.

You have deliberately used such document (gained unlawfully) to
claim that you ‘do not have jurisdiction to investigate my
complaints’. You are therefore assisting perjury by relying on
those orders.

As stated previously, nowadays, court orders can be gained through
a payment. As the judge was not sitting on that day and has made
the order privately (upon your request or use of resources), there
is reasonable evidence to substantiate that the orders you relied
upon has been gained by misleading the court. There was no trial
and those orders were issued in our absence as you are a corporate
body who works with the courts and we are ordinary civilians. You
have therefore misused your powers.

I believe you understand the seriousness of those matters if they
proceed to the public. The best practice is to accept what you have
done wrong and to reach appropriate remedies rather than proceeding
with these matters. You are therefore urged to proceed with the
Stage 2 complaints procedures. We also understand that you are
currently holding the FOI request until the ‘claimed’ eviction date
as you organised in 2012.

Yours faithfully,

—————————————————————————————————————

Dear Mrs Ismail,

Please note that your enquiry is not being pursued through the
complaints procedure due to the reasons already provided to you in
my previous two emails sent to you today. With reference there is
no independent investigation. To reiterate, the issues raised have
already been addressed in a court of law and the outcome which I
stated to you in my previous response is lawful and binding.
Therefore, please speak with the Local Government Ombudsman as the
Local Authority have no further comment to make.

Regards

Pauline Jones
———————————————————————————————————

“I am afraid that you are completely incorrect. A court of law
over-rides the complaints procedure. As previously advised, please
speak with the Local Government Ombudsman if you remain unhappy.

Regards

Pauline Jones

————————————————————————————————————-
COMPLAINT DETAILS

Details of the complaint: 1. THIS IS A COMPLAINT ABOUT MR MICHAEL
MACKAY (DEPUTY DIRECTOR CHILDREN SERVICES).

2. He was involved in our children’s case since 2012 and assisted
perjury and misrepresentation to the court. He has misconducted
with his public office duties by way of misusing his position and
assisting to cover up.

3. He was working with Mrs Norma irish, Avion Grant, Liz Forde and
Hazlyn hazel. all involved in our children’s case. He communicated
with third parties such as UKBA and other organisations to harm our
children and cause damages to their lives.

4. Mr Mac Kay has prevented other social workers to make an
independent assessment and other entitlements. he has obstructed
other officers’ duties towards the children.

5. As a director, Mr Mackay contributed alongside with the above
named social workers to manipulate assessments and to favour
certain individuals within UKBA and other places who are leading a
hate campaign against our family.

6. Mr Mac Kay indicate din a n email sent to us on 12/9/2014 that
our children’s case is closed but he failed to provide us with the
formal decision and to substantiate his claim.

7. Mr MacKay attached Mrs Sameerah Khan to the email and we
understand that she is from legal department. She denied any
involvement.

8. Mr MacKay is misusing the public purse by paying a large sum of
over £4000 to private solicitors for a repossession claim filed in
Bow County Court with wrong names and information.

9. as he is a director, it is clear that he is advising and
ordering other social workers to act against us in an illegal
manner.

It is also obvious that he will not take reasonable steps to
resolve those issues as he is misusing his position and public
purse (tax payers Money). We were teachers in this country and we
understand this wastage.

Therefore, Mr MacKay’s conduct should be under investigation.

What would you like done: INVESTIGATE MR MACKAY CONDUCT AND ALL THE
COMMUNICATIONS AND INTERNAL ACTIVITIES WHICH HE IS CARRYING OUT
AGAINST OUR FAMILY.

Yours faithfully,

BARRISTER CHRISTOPHER SNELL

faxScopier14102313080

A complaint was made to Bar Standards Board about Mr Snell’s conduct in Bow County Court during a hearing.  He basically mislead the court and provided deceptive and false information to the judge sitting who was District Judge North.

The complaint was as follows:

  1. Mr Snell has mislead the court.

He has failed to advise his clients that the claim was wrongly filed with the incorrect claimants name and defendants name.

The submissions he relied upon were fraudulent and misleading. He was aware of it as clearly indicated in our skeleton

argument which we sent to them 2 days before the hearing. During the hearing, he said: “The claimants are seeking

repossession.” the judge asked him who were the claimants and whether they are present. he replied: “The claimants are

present and they are RHP Services.” On the claim form, the claimants are Mr Natha and others. Upon notifying him that he

was giving contradictory information and misleading the judge, Mr Snell attempted to cover up accusing us of rent arrears of

£17000 but this was not the case. He failed to prove his point. In any circumstance, he has mislead the judge and the judge

was merely taking instructions from Mr Snell who kept on misguiding him and the case. He used his legal privileges to

mislead the judge who was only a solicitor (lower than him).

  1. Mr Snell has discriminated us because of our race, religion and status.

He has discriminated us by his body language and by referring us as “These people …” He did not respect his duty as a

counsel and failed to be polite. He did not introduce himself outside the court as we were unaware that he was representing

the claimants. Mr Snell however stared at us in an impolite, rude and intimidating manner outside the courtroom without

approaching us to introduce himself. He was intimidating us by speaking to all the court staffs and sitting next to them. His

body language and behaviour were discriminative to us.

  1. Mr Snell has failed to uphold the rule of law and the proper administration of justice.

He has mislead the court and relied upon false representations. Mr Snell has breached his code of conduct by misleading

and influencing the judge’s decision. He acted in a way through his body language (smiles, laughs or signing with his hands)

when we were addressing the court or the judge was listening to us. His body movements, though in silence, compelled the

judge to look at him and divert his attention to him. Mr Snell approach was such that it is difficult to figure out at once that he

was trying to obstruct the course of justice. but if one clearly examine his body language, it is imperative to conclude that Mr

Snell is obstructing fair justice.

  1. Mr Snell’s integrity is to be questioned.

He has knowingly and recklessly deceived the court. The judge who is a solicitor was unaware of those proceedings and did

not have any qualification to deal with the hearing. He was merely asking advice from Mr Snell who did advise him but with

deceit. Mr Snell was knowingly and recklessly misleading him and providing him wrong interpretation of the law.

  1. Mr Snell failed to submit his skeleton argument or representations of what he will submit in the court.

He provided some untrue and contradictory/false evidences during the hearing which we were not aware of, he spoke some

things which we did not know. he sent a statement of costs 1 hour before hearing takes place by fax. The judge

acknowledged that the statement of costs should have been sent at least 24 hours before the hearing. But as Mr Snell was

provocative and manipulative, the judge forgot this breach of duty and went on to give his order.

Mr Snell does not have any respect to the children. He and the judge purportedly delayed the hearing when they knew that

children were waiting outside the courtroom and hungry.

  1. He interrupted Mrs Ismail’s submissions and interfered with it. he distracted the judge’s and Mrs Ismail’s focus on the

matter. He knew that the Judge is his junior and his legal privileges will assist him. He is aware of the institutional racism

campaign against and was confident.

7.. Judge North’s actions will also be complained of. The solicitor whom Mr Snell was acting for has also been complained to

SRA.

It has always been the duty of a barrister, solicitor, legal executive or any other professional representing a client in

proceedings before any court to discharge not only the duties to his client but the duty to the court. That duty is in part

reflected in s.188 of the Legal Services Act 2007 as a duty applicable to anyone exercising rights of audience or conducting

litigation in the court by virtue of an authorisation under the Act as a duty to “act with independence in the interests of justice”.

The content of the duty to the court is spelt out in a number of cases.

In Ridehalgh v Horsefield [1994] Ch 205 at page 234 Sir Thomas Bingham, MR (as he then was) made clear that although a legal representative of the parties was bound to strive to win a case, he must do so without in any way seeking to evade the rules intended to safeguard the administration of justice.

The reason why that is so important is that misleading the court is regarded by the court and must be regarded by any disciplinary tribunal as one of the most serious offences that an advocate or litigator can commit. It is not simply a breach of a rule of a game, but a fundamental affront to a rule designed to safeguard the fairness and justice of proceedings.